|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 11 post(s) |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 11:39:00 -
[1] - Quote
Sabriz Adoudel wrote:Disgusted by CCP's stance of banning people for 'RL abuse' while tolerating out-of-game threats of violence made in the EVE client and forums.
I am disgusted by hypocrits. Funny when i am shot down, or i shoot down others, i do not get any threats. Especially no RL threats. I get frustrated loosing a ship and get angry. (i assume my victim too) but... So the question you avoid: What do YOU do, that someone gets so agitatet? I assume, that you willingly provoke those actions. So in the end, you wouldn't have shot someone, you humuliate them out of the game, when they react the way you plan for. You probably think this is smart! Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 11:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mallak Azaria wrote:but are you really trying that people who scam & gank in game only do so because they're unwilling to shoot people irl?
Nope, bad english may be, but i think it takes some mind-bending to read this out of my posting. As RL threats are not to be taken lightly, still a certain group of people try hard to get emotional resonses.
Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 11:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:I'm pretty sure he's trying to say that, he's blown stuff up and been blown up and never once been threatened for it or whatever, so for it to happen to someone else, they must have provoked it in some other way to begin with. That's how I understood it.
Yes thats what i meant. Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 12:01:00 -
[4] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:La Rynx wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:I'm pretty sure he's trying to say that, he's blown stuff up and been blown up and never once been threatened for it or whatever, so for it to happen to someone else, they must have provoked it in some other way to begin with. That's how I understood it. Yes thats what i meant. Well, you're wrong, and I explained my experience: I was doxed without said RL provocation. [/quote]
Please lets be clear: I am wrong in your case, if you feel offended, i am sorry.
but still those mentioned people exist.
Adrie Atticus wrote: 4) If you live in a civilized country, aiding and abetting is reality; if it's a group activity you need to understand that this will leave you vulnerable to enforcement via proxy unless you can prove that you have nothing to do with the activity other people are accused of. If you are not sure about this, contact CCP when you see something which could be seen as a breach of EULA/ToS.
On the topic of social behaviour: if you can discuss and act around total strangers in the middle of the street in a way these alleged violators have, then the behaviour should be accepted and shouldn't be enforceable. If this behaviour cannot be done to a total stranger on the street and it would cause someone to contact the authorities, then the alleged violations are not part of human social interaction and shouldn't be projected towards a player.
I think this is quite clear and not very hard to understand. Something like the bonus room would not work. Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 12:07:00 -
[5] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:La Rynx wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote:I'm pretty sure he's trying to say that, he's blown stuff up and been blown up and never once been threatened for it or whatever, so for it to happen to someone else, they must have provoked it in some other way to begin with. That's how I understood it. Yes thats what i meant. Well, you're wrong, and I explained my experience: I was doxed without said RL provocation.
Wait a moment... I did not say -RL- provokation. I am talking of in-game provokation, other than shooting the ships. Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
40
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 12:13:00 -
[6] - Quote
Black Pedro wrote:You can take a look at Erotica 1's commentary if you need to get up to speed on the current discussion:
as expected its just more e1 tears. he got banned for the bonus rooms. Fact ppl just wondered, "why only him?" so: it is not only him. some ppl tried to keep this sadistic behavior alive and now cry because they got cought. "mommy i was only standing by and clapping..." Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
41
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 15:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
I must assume that here are a lot of griefer tears. No one playing EvE at EvE's sake, is in any danger of being hit by the ban hammer.
The one who *are* afraid and crying or go "ggggrrr CCP", will have a reason to be afraid.
Those banned appear to have pushed the boundaries to far. Don't wanna be banned? Do not push the boundaries! I can not understand how people still doubt the decision over this e1 guy and blame the blogger. Hmm? Where is the blogger this time? No one around? Ok, lets diss CCP...
Yeah OK, you wanna play the bad guy, do that. But pushing the metagame to far, trying to optimise the fountain of tears, you might get hit.
The EvE Sandbox was meant to be a Space-Sandbox guy shoot at other guys. Not guys humiliate other guys. Some guys need learn some decency. Its quite clear that CCP dosnt want you to do things, that would you do to complete Strangers you meet at the street. Nothing of that crap would happen. Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
41
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 15:40:00 -
[8] - Quote
Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote:The information we have so far from Ero on this latest round of bans is very disconcerting. We will update as more information becomes available.
More griefer tears. Any update will even be more and more griefer tears. You and this ban hammer are the least of CCP's sorrows. CCP will happily welcome a lot of WoW Bears in Exchange for you grief players. I would not miss you! SOV Wars in 0 Sec want miss you. Well who else than this sorry little bunch of griefers will miss themselfes? Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
42
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 15:46:00 -
[9] - Quote
Sibyyl wrote:La Rynx wrote:I must assume that here are a lot of griefer tears. No one playing EvE at EvE's sake, is in any danger of being hit by the ban hammer.
You are as much in the dark as we are in terms of what specific (note: I don't mean 'exact') rules are being applied to players who get banned. You can make this statement with about as much certainty as a fellow carrying around a metal rod in a lightning storm.
In the light of a flood of propaganda, your posts are based on FUD! F ear U n certainty D oubt
Times change CCP adapts, so do you, or leave. CCP leaves intentionaly no exact line, but expects to have some decency. Seeing what was happening until now, i have noticed one thing: CCP is not using the ban-hammer excessivly, so i am willing to assume, those bans where reasonable.
Whom do i trust more? Griefers or CCP?
Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
42
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 15:55:00 -
[10] - Quote
Amyclas Amatin wrote:The new order's military might is laughable. I confirm!
Amyclas Amatin wrote: But we have media control.
That was blown with th AT12 incident.. Running away, tail tucked between legs. codies are laughing stock. --> despite the desparate flood of countr propaganda.
Amyclas Amatin wrote: The meta-game is always pushed to extremes. Those who do not do it will lose in-game. That is why we need guidelines.
CCP had Decency in mind, but was not expecting that ppl threw that concept over board. Forum Main |
|

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
43
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 16:05:00 -
[11] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:I wonder if the clattering of pitchforks and the howling for CCP to cater to the entitled player minority actually disrupts the day to day activities in Reykjavik?
What howling? Law was ruled by the jovian empire before the masses could muster ther pitchforks.
Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
44
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 21:34:00 -
[12] - Quote
Yes, indeed a fun thing to watch.
CCP Falcon was clear!
If you are not sure if your action is crossing the line, most likely it IS crossing the line. Conclusion: don't do it. Thats all there is! No magic, no mean intents.
Also: It appears to me, that this was a general ban wave, than something directed, only to a certain group. Oh and please stop comparing mittanis metagaming to this bonus-room-crap. Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
45
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 21:46:00 -
[13] - Quote
Ahh the griefer tears...
A lot of those evil RL threads were done, when people where provoked in one way or another. However, a very very big majority is not serious. Aside from suicide gankers people worked hard on their ships and loosing stuff gets everyone eemotional. If provoked further a lot of people will write nasty stuff. Still not OK, but to a certain degree understandable. I think this is a lame excuse. Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
45
|
Posted - 2014.09.11 21:51:00 -
[14] - Quote
By reports you mean rumors.
Who said, that all bans where connected?
You are afraid to be hit to? You will a have a reason to be afraid.
CCP does not ban lightly, no matter what a certain group says.
Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
45
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 07:55:00 -
[15] - Quote
Arden Elenduil wrote:I have a quick question here myself. If a player were to go outside of the game and look up my personal information such as real name, address, workplace, etc.... And use those ingame to threathen me by spreading that info around. How would you look upon that? Worthy of the same punishment as these people got?
Yes, that is a real life threat. It invites "idiots" to take silly actions against you. (swatting) --> bannable offense Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
45
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 08:10:00 -
[16] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote: I know the consequences of taking the game to the real world. The person who did it to me is still playing the game. Why, they're online right now.
And you are still alive and posting! And i am quite sure that you are not fear for you life.
Whatever. more tears and more repetition from a certain group. It has been explained why the "line" is not absolutly clear. Information about the bans is withhold, because those things will be handled by CCP and NOT by the forum and blogs. As CCP Falcon stated "People with half a brain" should know and understand what went wrong. Yes i would like to know more. Am i entitled to know more? No! So aren't you!
You say you need more information to judge for yourself? Its not up to you to judge.
This tears are not because you want EvE to get a better sandbox. Those tears are flowing because you do not like the consequences.
Remiel Pollard wrote: According to my experience, where essentially this happened to me, it's not bannable at all. And they were threatening my family.
So you say CCP is unfair to you... Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
45
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 08:17:00 -
[17] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:FleetWarp Ichoriya wrote:Mind you you only rent a license to use EVE-Online, they can nullify your license at any time. And so can I. Stop acting like customer-company relations is a one-way street where the company just does whatever it wants without consequence, because that really isn't the case. If CCP starts banning a bunch of people under questionable and ambiguous circumstances, others will get fed up and take their patronage elsewhere.
Then, please, leave. Since you don't like what CCP is trying and do not try to understand whats happening, you can not only repeat yourself and stomp with you feet. You can leave. This is an empty threat, CCP will not lose a lot of ppl. Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
45
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 09:00:00 -
[18] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote: That's not the ******* point you brainless shitstain. I actually WAS fearing for the safety of my family, especially when my mother called me in tears about some weirdo that contacted her on Facebook. You weren't here when I posted the evidence of it here, you weren't there when I was trying to calm her down on the phone, and it's probably never the **** happened to you. More of this "out of sight, out of mind" bullshit where "it didn't happen to me so it's a non-issue". K, whatever. I hope it never does happen to you, it's ******* creepy, but don't ******* trivialise my experience just because I'm 'still standing' or some ****.
But forget that, you said this was a bannable offense, and now you're acting like it's not even a thing just because I'm still alive and posting? Are you huffing ******* chalk or something? Get a clue.
Thank you with every post i get more clues. On our first exchange you said you did no RL things to those guys. I must assume, that means you egged those ppl quite a while. It takes some effort to get names and addresses. Next is, that those realy got your RL contacts, which, in my oppinion, is a bannable offense. If it can be proven that those guys where behind it. More than that threats over facebook are criminal acts not just "bannable".
Indeed it never happend to me, and, of course you will not want to believe me, i have some virtual kills on my side. Next is, that facebook is *very* fast in taking action against weirdos like that. More: you shall not post here, you need to petition, no reason to ask in the forums for moral support. Calling me names does not help you, it is still a complete another case, you better repetition it, with all prove you have. You better get facebook and you law-enforcement into business to.
And not to the question: What does it have to do with the actual bans? Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
45
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 09:05:00 -
[19] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote: What the police do.
Ah, the police acted.
Remiel Pollard wrote: How they dealt with the player is not the issue here,
You got that right, this case has nothing to do with your case. So you just want to kidnapp this threat into your favour.
Remiel Pollard wrote: who is facing charges, but still playing. Even if I wanted to, I can't really tell you much without endangering the ongoing investigation, which includes multiple cases of a similar nature by the same offender - while I have previously made the evidence publicly available, the police requested I take it down as it is part of ongoing proceedings.
It's all beside the point though. This is not about what the police are doing, this is about what CCP did. Which is nothing. That player is in the game right now. Maybe you'll be his next victim? I really hope not, I'll cross my fingers for you. I know I have him blocked, and watchlisted.
So CCP did not enough for you? CCP shall act, when it is still processed? I can understand you are angry, but this is not very logical from you. Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
46
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 09:11:00 -
[20] - Quote
Dave Stark wrote:La Rynx wrote:What does it have to do with the actual bans? probably the inconsistency of bans and punishments handed out by CCP.
A certain group wants to spin that this direction.
Dave Stark wrote: some people do a few things out of game and get banned, other people get real life threats like this and ccp does nothing.
Well, what now? CCP shall NOT enforce general bans. CCP shall check before they ban.
Dave Stark wrote: you know, the thing this thread is about; the lack of clarity of what is, and isn't acceptable, and why enforcement of the rules doesn't seem to have any consistency and you're left with GM roulette as to rule enforcement.
There is no roulette. Remember the "half a brain" thing CCP Falcon mentioned.
Actually this case even proves, that CCP threads carefully before pulling out the hammer. Forum Main |
|

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:23:00 -
[21] - Quote
Cismet wrote:Well, not that I expect anyone to care, but it's important that CCP understand. I just cancelled my subscription. CCP's attitude in this matter is utterly unconscionable and Falcon's passive aggressive and borderline insulting posts are unacceptable. I can only hope that CCP learn the hard way when subscriber numbers drop.
Bye!
AAhh ganker tears. You bail out on rumors, having sympathy for? A group of griefers? Loosing those will benefit New Eden
Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:32:00 -
[22] - Quote
grrr CCP grrr GM grrr ISD
sure guys...
Not enough data to come to a final conclusion if every ban was ok. BUT CCP does not swing the ban hammer lightly.
Explain details to the rules? It has been explained why not and clearly enough. In fact it would be bad for this "holy sandbox" the same people cry about.
there is no real discussion anymore. Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:33:00 -
[23] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:James Amril-Kesh wrote:RubyPorto wrote:But this is all wildly off topic, and I would have thought that the ISDs wouldn't dive into a discussion solely to engage in an off-topic tangent.  Especially considering they just blatantly deleted a bunch of posts that didn't violate any rule other than being somewhat off topic. I think the rule against abuse of ISDs is stupid, because they clearly have no problem just wantonly deleting our posts, something which I'd argue constitutes abuse of its own. The majority of ISD who post here are power hungry dicks. Golly, so much anger in so few words. Take a coffee break before you risk a forum ban.
I would recommend tea or hot milk. Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:42:00 -
[24] - Quote
MatrixSkye Mk2 wrote:Admittedly, this is what makes it extremely difficult for me to empathize with these individuals. They actually enjoy taunting and provoking negative reactions from others. And they proudly post and display "tear collection" trophies publicly so that others like them can enjoy and stroke their ego. If they can get their victims to rage-quit or rage-banned, that's just the sweet cherry on top. It's very sadistic behavior.
And by no means am I suggesting "they deserve to be doxxed" or threatened in real life. No one does. But how much empathy could you have for someone like this? They enjoy making others angry, upset, and miserable for cheap laughs and giggles.
One argument that come often from "their" side is, thats just "a game" and "pixels shooting pixels", it is that hypocrisy, an elobaret lie just to get more emotional responses.
And often when the **** hits the fan, it its the innocent and the noninvolved. Its realy bad that those guys mother cried, i really really hate something like that.
But playing with emotional resonses is playing with old bombs. Some might blow right into your face.
Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:51:00 -
[25] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote: Remiel was playing EVE in a perfectly acceptable and legitimate way.
He did a lot of things. I dont know the details, but no wonder he is a posts a lot here. His way of playing and his account maybe in danger of a future ban.
James Amril-Kesh wrote: This does not ******* excuse doxing and real life threats to person and family. If you think so you are blaming the victim.
Thinking is not blaming. I explanned more than enough that in this case his mother was the victim of a criminal act.
But *what* i say is, that his style of playing is in constant "danger" of those reactions.
Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:57:00 -
[26] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:La Rynx wrote:But *what* i say is, that his style of playing is in constant "danger" of those reactions. Driving a car puts you in constant danger of a sudden and early death. Does that mean I deserve it if I get into an accident?
I see why you are asking for exact rules, you have some problems with your cognition. I can not help you with that.
But Yes, why not.
Lets say you drive your car drunk and angry and drive full speed into a kindergarden group. A lot of those children die, lots are crippled for life. What do you say? Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 20:59:00 -
[27] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Don't ever apply to detective school. You'd be wasting your money. Mr Epeen  I'm pretty sure that every step between "CCP says x person was banned because he specifically did this thing" and "we've cracked CCP's security scheme" is something along the lines of "Mr Epeen talks out of his ass and suggests some causal link between completely unrelated things for the sole purpose of being a contrarian."
I like your tears. But your arguments lack qualitiy and reasons. Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
53
|
Posted - 2014.09.12 21:02:00 -
[28] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote: And there you are blaming them for being such.
guys fishing for emotional reactions maybe victims, but are they innocent?
Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
57
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 08:44:00 -
[29] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote: The same empathy I have for someone who gets threatened or harassed for bragging about a Chess tournament win (bragging which sometimes makes the losers of the tournament angry, upset, and/or miserable).
They are the victim of a crime/EULA violation*.
As i said this thread got boring.
At the moment its those "grr CCP" guys trying to move the role "victim" to a certain group of persons.
What i am saying that in those cases of "fishing for tears and emotions" are sadistic. The Executioners are victims of RL threads, all right, but. and i think i made that clear to: They are not innocent because theyself initiated the Events.
Example for EULA conflict? the ban-hammer for erotica1
Provocation in law suits? Provoked car accidents for ensurance frauds do ask who was the Provokateur.
Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
57
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 08:59:00 -
[30] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote: Suicide ganking is allowed, provided it's not unreasonably excessively focused on one player. ...
this is the line: if Stuff is not "unreasonably excessively focused on one player.".
This Thread gives me the impression some people can not / or don't want to decide when unreasonable excessiv begins.
Ganking? Freighterhunt in Uedama? Singransom? There is NO Problem. not by me (unimportant but i want to mention) and not by CCP and the GM. (Please ask CCP Falcon).
CCP might have made errors with bans? Thats not in question, thats a given.
CCP decides wether it likes or dislikes people? utter nonsense, CCP doesn't care about in game stuff. the hardly know any player names.
where error made with this actual swing of the ban-hammer? possible: act like a pro (HTFU) and make a petition. IMO: there are far more players that shout "i am innocent" then really innocent banned players. which gets me back, CCP does not swing this hammer lightly.
lots of posts here try nothing more then to create FUD in favour of the those who where banned with a godd reason. Forum Main |
|

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
57
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 09:19:00 -
[31] - Quote
edit failed to lazy to rebuild Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
57
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 09:33:00 -
[32] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Yeah, go join the army one day.
 Been there, done that.
Remiel Pollard wrote: No one is talking about provoked reactions. There are a lot of unprovoked attacks that have taken place in this game where the aggressor has not faced CCP policy enforcement. That's what he's saying.
I was specific. I was talking of provoked reactions. thats at least no one (0) + 1 (me).
It gets boring to say it again and again: unprovoked serious RL threats are criminal acts with out ANY question.
I AM stating that lots of grief players want to play innocent lambs when in fact, they have been provoking their victims over hours. A big groups is the CLOWNS. Alliance. No wait, the name is CODE.
Forum Main |

La Rynx
School of Applied Knowledge Caldari State
57
|
Posted - 2014.09.13 10:12:00 -
[33] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote: No, you're just trashing an entire group of people based on the choices of a few bad apples.
" lots of grief players want to play innocent lambs when in fact, they have been provoking their victims over hours." this *is* a group only consisting of bad apples.
Remiel Pollard wrote: Where I come from, that's called ignorance and bigotry.
You mean the CLOWNS...sorry CODE alliance? for one, thats not just a "few" bad apples. sadism and griefing as used and supported by the CEOs make them a complete bunch. You would need to point out some good apples in this bunch.
PS and i think you are a hipocrit. Forum Main |
|
|
|